Based on the TU117 die the new GeForce GTX 1650 still includes all of the new Turing shader innovations that improve performance and efficiency, including back up for concurrent floating point and integer operations, a unified cache architecture with larger L1 cache, and adaptive shading.

The TDP for the new GPU is but 75 watts and that means it doesn't crave an external ability connector, so information technology will be the fastest graphics card available that won't need external PCIe power. Then like the GTX 1660 Ti and 1660, there won't be a Founders Edition version, but no big loss there.

The GTX 1650 packs 896 CUDA cores, that's 36% fewer than what you get with the GTX 1660. That is the biggest downgrade we've seen in the Turing production stack yet. For the about role we've seen cuts of around 20% when going from the 2080 to the 2070, 2070 to the 2060, 2060 to the 1660 Ti and and then just 8% from the 1660 Ti to the vanilla 1660.

The but other example of over a ~thirty% downgrade was the RTX 2080 Ti to the RTX 2080, here we saw a 32% reduction in cadre count and this pb to a ~25% reduction in operation at 4K. We expect to see a similar functioning reduction for the GTX 1650 when compared to the 1660, equally the 36% reduction in cores is backed by a 33% reduction in memory bandwidth.

Moreover, whereas the 1660 is armed with 6GB of GDDR5 memory, the GTX 1650 gets 4GB using a mere 128-bit wide memory coach for peak memory bandwidth of 128GB/south. The default clock speeds have been set to a base of operations of 1485 MHz and a boost of 1665 MHz, a 7% clock speed reduction when compared to the GTX 1660.

Nvidia claims the GTX 1650 is twice every bit fast every bit the GTX 950, and up to lxx% faster than the GTX 1050 at 1080p, though the wording is a piffling tricky hither every bit their merits is specific to modernistic games with circuitous shaders. Then games such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Wolfenstein II, for example. Therefore the boilerplate performance uplift could be lower depending on the title.

For testing we'll be looking closely at 1080p functioning in a dozen titles. Our exam system is the usual GPU bench that includes a Core i9-9900K clocked at five GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory...

Benchmarks

Kickstarting the benchmarks is a new title in our exam suite: Earth State of war Z. This game supports the Vulkan API though operation for Nvidia GPUs isn't not bad with the current driver, so GeForce cards accept been tested using DX11 while AMD uses the lower level Vulkan API. Yet this saw the Radeon RX 570 smoke the new GTX 1650 by a whopping 38% margin. Meanwhile the GTX 1650 was 26% faster than the 1050 Ti, just besides 15% slower than the 1060 3GB.

Performance in Noon Legends was very competitive between the GTX 1650 and RX 570 at to the lowest degree on the quiet section of the game that we examination. The Radeon GPU was faster past a slim 4% margin and generally anything less than v% we deem a describe.

The Division 2 has been a strong championship for AMD and that continues with this RX 570 vs. GTX 1650 battle. Here the Radeon GPU offered 27% more operation at 1080p making it the vastly superior GPU.

Nvidia promised good things in new circuitous titles such equally Shadow of the Tomb Raider but here we can see the GTX 1650 simply isn't delivering. Performance was similar to that of the RX 570 just for a new GPU, similar functioning isn't practiced plenty. The GTX 1650 should be comfortably beating the 570 at this toll point.

The GTX 1650 takes a serious beating in Forza Horizon 4 where it was 21% slower than the RX 570. This deviation was also noticeable in-game as the RX 570 never dipped below lx fps, allowing information technology to offer a smoother gaming experience.

On average the Radeon RX 570 was 11% faster than the 1650 when testing with Only Crusade 4, typically this is a good title for Nvidia but fifty-fifty here the new budget Turing tin't get information technology done.

Resident Evil two is another new title that works well on AMD hardware and here the RX 570 was thirty% faster than the GTX 1650. While the Radeon GPU was able to maintain over 60 fps at all times, the 1650 dropped down to 50 fps.

One game that you lot can ever depend on to boost GeForce functioning is Fortnite and here the GTX 1650 is able to edge out the RX 570 past a small margin. The GTX 1650 was also 26% faster than the 1050 Ti.

Metro Exodus is an Nvidia sponsored title then you'd expect the GTX 1650 to become the win hither, simply information technology doesn't. Basically it matched the RX 570 but that was the best information technology could practise hither.

Rainbow Six Siege throws united states a curveball, though given what we've seen from Turing in this title I was prepare for information technology. Here the GTX 1650 is able to beat the RX 570 and by a disarming margin, shame we didn't encounter more than of it.

We run into like frame rates in Battleground V. The RX 570 was slightly faster on average while both provided a similar ane% depression result. This meant the GTX 1650 was 26% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti and xi% slower than the 1060 3GB.

The GTX 1650 doesn't impress in Far Weep New Dawn, scoring 23% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti but xviii% slower than the RX 570. In fact, at 1080p using the ultra quality preset it struggled to average threescore fps.

Power Consumption & Temperatures

Moving on to power consumption, the GTX 1650 is reasonably impressive in this regard. The Gigabyte board we tested pushed total system consumption to 184 watts, while the MSI card hit 192 watts. This is only a ~x% increase in organisation draw for what looked to be over 30% comeback in performance.

In comparing, the Radeon RX 570 pushed full system consumption 55% higher. So the 1650 is certainly more than efficient, simply we're not convinced it's a meliorate product overall.

Taking a quick look at operating temperatures and clock speeds, the MSI Gaming X peaked at 61 degrees in a 21 degree room and this saw it typically operating at a boost frequency of 1920 MHz. Needless to say, it was very absurd and placidity.

The larger Gigabyte Gaming OC was able to best that issue with a peak operating temperature of just 58 degrees and this immune it to boilerplate 1950 MHz for the boost clock. In terms of frame rate operation, this didn't make a departure, but running slightly cooler for a slight crash-land in frequency is a win for Gigabyte.

Performance Summary

At this point your socks should be firmly in identify, the GeForce GTX 1650 has been pretty underwhelming so far. But to get a clearer picture, permit's look at a few head to head comparisons.

GTX 1650 vs. GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia keeps comparison the GTX 1650 to the GTX 1050, but the 1650 is $10 more than the launch cost of the 1050 Ti , and then it's by no means a replacement for the $110 GTX 1050. When compared to the 1050 Ti, the 1650 is 35% faster on average for a few actress bucks. After 3 years a 35% boost at this toll signal is kind of underwhelming.

GTX 1650 vs. GTX 1060 3GB

When compared to the GTX 1060 3GB (historically a more expensive GPU), the GTX 1650 was nigh ix% slower. Granted the 1060 came in at $200, but once more, it'due south a 3 year old GPU. The GTX 1650 offered small performance gains in a few titles, but best example scenario, it wasn't even v% faster than the outgoing Pascal GPU.

GTX 1650 vs. GTX 1060

When compared to its firsthand sibling, the GTX 1660, the GTX 1650 was 32% slower which seems fine given it's 32% cheaper, that works out rather well. At least in a GTX Turing bubble it does. Only as you lot're about to meet in this price range, there's quite a bit of contest with AMD lowering prices in reaction to Nvidia's latest releases.

GTX 1650 vs. Radeon RX 570

Here we have the RX 570 which is a $170 part, or at least information technology was once upon a time. For many months this Radeon GPU has been selling for as little as $130 and currently at that place are multiple options at that price. This makes the GTX 1650 ~xv% more expensive and yet we found information technology to exist 10% slower on average.

In some titles that gap was as wide every bit 20% slower, so in pure value terms the GTX 1650 cannot compete with the Radeon.

Wrap Up

Our toll per frame graph will paint the ultimate motion-picture show of where the GTX 1650 stands at launch. Ii years afterwards the release of the RX 570, we're getting a GPU that's more costly per frame.

Even if nosotros ignore the insanely good value RX 570, the RX 580 is even so improve value thanks to its recent price cuts, offering way more performance for a modest price premium. We can encounter that the GTX 1650 offers a like level of value to that of the 1660, but at under $200 where Nvidia faces stiffer competition and where actress frame rates can brand a world of difference, this won't cut it to make our recommendation.

At the current $150 MSRP, the GTX 1650 is not a bad product but if yous are seeking the all-time possible frame rates for every dollar spent, then the RX 570 is simply superior. At $110 the 1650 would accept been competitive, not especially heady but at least competitive.

Some volition argue that the GTX 1650 is groovy because it doesn't need an external ability connector, just you lot'd be clutching at straws on that one. You tin can upgrade your power supply if need exist for around $35 to a decent 450-500 watt model and that'll get you out of trouble. Moreover, we noticed that the GTX 1650's that lack an external PCIe ability input are clocked lower as they're limited to 75 watts -- both MSI and Gigabyte cards tested here had a power connector -- then that will touch performance further. In other words, yous could finish up with a very small upgrade over the GTX 1050 Ti.

We've purchased an additional GTX 1650 base of operations card without the power connector and volition criterion that soon, merely nosotros doubt that testing will place the GTX 1650 in better lite. For mainstream and affordable GPU options we saw the appeal of the RTX 2060, GTX 1660 Ti and 1660, in all cases receiving our recommendations. For less money however the RX 570 lives on.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • Radeon RX 570 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 580 on Amazon, Newegg
  • Radeon RX 590 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce GTX 1660 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg